How AI is applied across API Evangelist and APIs.io. Read my AI disclosure →
API Evangelist API Evangelist
Discovery
Learnings
Guidance
Toolbox
Alignment
API Evangelist LLC
The State of Developer Tools APIs cover

API Evangelist Paper · Market Report

The State of Developer Tools APIs

The best-scoring industry in the catalog — first of twenty-five — and it publishes idempotency at the same 2.8% rate as the worst. The gap was never competence.

$500.00 Version 1.3 · August 2026
picture_as_pdf Formatted PDF, ~35 pages
description Editable Microsoft Word (.docx)
database The AI data bundle — every provider, scored (JSON/CSV/YAML)
update Free updates to this paper, for life
lock Secure checkout via Stripe

About this paper

Every time a low agent-readiness number is published, the reply is some version of those companies are young, or unsophisticated, or not really API companies. So the industry where none of that applies is scored here: 2,877 developer tools and DevOps companies — the people who write the specifications, sell the linters, run the gateways, and build the tools every other industry uses to build its APIs.

They are the best in the catalog. Developer Tools & DevOps ranks first of twenty-five industries, averaging 34.1 against a catalog average of 22.5, with a third the Minimal-band rate of everything else tracked and the highest single score recorded. And it publishes idempotency at 2.8% — against the artificial-intelligence industry’s 2.6%. Consent, 4.4% against 3.9%. Agent-Native among its Exemplars, 2.6% against AI’s 5.2%, which means on that measure the best industry in the catalog is worse than one of the weakest. Six of the organizations at the centre of how this industry describes and governs APIs sit in the Human-Only band. The full report has the ranking table, the four sub-groups, the mirror the API tooling vendors hold up to themselves, the one voluntary standard in this series that actually worked and why the reason does not transfer, and the argument that whatever these thirty-odd companies make the default propagates to every other industry scored.

What's inside

  1. Executive summary — first of twenty-five, and the same 2.8%
  2. The state of the industry — competence, measured
  3. The resource taxonomy — a contract that describes the machine
  4. The composite Kin Score
  5. Agent-readiness — where competence stops
  6. The blueprint
  7. The standards layer — the industry that writes the standards
  8. The regulatory layer — nothing compels any of this
  9. Standards and artifacts for the agentic turn
  10. Security, auth, scopes and compliance
  11. Provider-by-provider intelligence
  12. The investable thesis
  13. Where this is going

database Includes the AI data bundle

This report ships with a machine-readable data bundle — the evidence behind every number, packaged to drop straight into the AI tool of your choice. Converse with the research you bought, check any claim against the source data, and take it further than the PDF.

data_object providers.json / .csv / .yaml — every provider, layered raw → enriched → derived
table_rows scores.csv & rankings.csv — facet-by-facet scores, composite vs. agent-readiness rank
insights market-stats.json & capabilities.json — sector averages, band distribution, per-provider artifact inventory
forum AI-START-HERE + data dictionary, methodology & prompts — a paste-in primer so your AI reads it correctly

folder_zip Delivered as a single ZIP alongside your PDF and Word edition at checkout.

What you get for $500.00

picture_as_pdf A print-ready, formatted PDF edition
description The editable Word (.docx) source
database The AI data bundle — every provider scored, as JSON/CSV/YAML
forum An AI conversation primer so you can query the research directly
checklist The anti-patterns & self-assessment checklist
update Every future revision of this living paper
$500.00 PDF + Word + AI data bundle (ZIP), instant download

These papers are experience-based and vendor-neutral, distilled from the API Evangelist research at apievangelist.com. Questions before buying? [email protected].

arrow_back All papers